翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Louth County Council election, 1999 ・ Louth County Council election, 2004 ・ Louth County Council election, 2009 ・ Louth County Council election, 2014 ・ Louth GAA ・ Louth Island ・ Louth Navigation ・ Louth Park Abbey ・ Louth railway station ・ Louth Rural District ・ Louth Senior Football Championship ・ Louth Senior Hurling Championship ・ Louth to Bardney Line ・ Louth Town F.C. ・ Louth United F.C. ・ Louth v Diprose ・ Louth, County Louth ・ Louth, Lincolnshire ・ Louth, Lincolnshire (UK Parliament constituency) ・ Louth, New South Wales ・ Louth, St. Catharines ・ Louther, West Virginia ・ Louth–Meath (Dáil Éireann constituency) ・ Loutkář ・ Loutolim ・ Loutra Elenis ・ Loutra Volvis ・ Loutra, Rethymno ・ Loutraki ・ Loutraki-Perachora Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Louth v Diprose ： ウィキペディア英語版 Louth v Diprose ''Louth v Diprose'' ((1992) HCA 61) ) is an Australian contract law and equity case, in which unconscionable conduct is considered. ==Facts== Solicitor Louis Donald Diprose (the plaintiff/respondent) was infatuated with Carol Mary Louth (the defendant/appellant), whom he had met in Launceston, Tasmania in 1981. He showered her with gifts and, at one time, proposed to her; she, however, refused. Subsequently, the defendant informed plaintiff that she was depressed and was going to be evicted and, if this happened, she would commit suicide (this was largely untrue). In response, the plaintiff agreed to buy her a house and, at her insistence, put it in her name. Years later, when their relationship deteriorated, the plaintiff asked the defendant to transfer the house into his name. She refused and he brought proceedings seeking to recover the house. At the trial in the Supreme Court of South Australia, the court of first instance, the plaintiff won, with King CJ holding that for the defendant to retain the house and land would be unconscionable and thus the plaintiff was beneficially entitled to the land. The defendant subsequently appealed to the Full Court of South Australia again, however, the defendant lost on appeal, with Jacobs ACJ and Legoe J forming the majority and Matheson J dissenting. The defendant then filed special leave for an appeal to the High Court of Australia, which was granted. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Louth v Diprose」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.